Manejo de las fracturas maxilofaciales y sus complicaciones / Management of maxillofacial fractures and its complications

RESUMEN Antecedentes: el trauma maxilofacial corresponde a toda lesión traumática del macizo facial. Actualmente representa uno de los problemas de salud más importantes en el mundo. Nuestro objetivo es realizar un análisis de nuestra experiencia en las intervenciones realizadas en pacientes internados y sus complicaciones. Material y métodos: se realizó un estudio descriptivo, retrospectivo y observacional de 205 pacientes con fracturas maxilofaciales desde el año 2011 hasta el año 2019. Resultados: el 81,46% fueron hombres (n: 167) y el rango etario más afectado osciló entre los 21 y 30 años con el 38,54% (n:79). El accidente de tránsito 56,1% (n:115) fue el mecanismo de trauma más frecuente. Los tipos de fracturas faciales fueron: panfaciales 12,2% (n: 25), tercio superior 1,46% (n:3), tercio medio 72,2% (n:148) y tercio inferior 14,15% (n:29). Dentro del tercio superior, el 66,67% (n:2) fueron fracturas del seno frontal asociadas al hueso frontal, en el tercio medio las combinadas en un 54,73% (n:81) y en el tercio inferior, las complejas en el 34,48% (n:10). Fueron intervenidos 199 pacientes (97,07%). Solo el 11,56% (n:23) presentó alguna complicación. No se observaron complicaciones graves. Discusión: según nuestra serie, la mayoría de los pacientes fueron hombres jóvenes; la causa más frecuente, el accidente de tránsito, y el tercio medio, el más afectado, resultados estos similares a los de otros estudios publicados. El tratamiento quirúrgico fue principalmente reducción abierta y fijación con material de osteosíntesis de titanio, un procedimiento seguro y fiable, que permite restablecer la funcionalidad previa al traumatismo, con un índice muy bajo de complicaciones posoperatorias.

ABSTRACT Background: Maxillofacial trauma corresponds to all traumatic injuries affecting the facial bones. Nowadays, it represents one of the main healthcare issues worldwide. The aim of this study is to analyze our experience in the interventions performed in hospitalized and their complications. Material and methods: We performed a retrospective and observational study of 205 patients with maxillofacial fractures from 2011 to 2019. Results: 81.46% were men (n = 167) and 38.54% (n = 79) of the patients were between 21 and 30 years of age. Traffic collision was the most common mechanism of trauma (56,1%, n = 115). The types of facial fractures were panfacial (12.2%; n = 25), of the upper-third (1.43%; n = 3), of the middle-third (72.2%; n = 148) and of the lower third (14.15%; n = 29). In the upper third of the face frontal sinus fractures associated with the frontal bone were the most common (66.67%; n =2); in the middle-third combined fractures were most prevalent (54.73%; n = 81) while complex fractures were most frequent in the lower third (34,48%; n = 10). One-hundred and ninety-one patients were operated on (97.07%). Complications occurred in only 11.56% (n = 23) and were not serious. Discusion: In our series, most patients were young men, traffic collisions were the most common cause of trauma, and the middle third of the face was the most affected region. These results are similar to our publications. Surgical management, mostly by open reduction and fixation with titanium-based osteosynthesis material, is an effective, safe and reliable procedure, which allows the restoration of pre-trauma function, with very low rate of postoperative complications.

Solid Implants in Facial Plastic Surgery: Potential Complications and How to Prevent Them.

Allogenic implants are an effective alternative to autologous grafts in the reconstruction of facial defects. These implants are used to reconstruct a variety of bony and soft-tissue defects, including the frontal and temporal regions; internal orbit; infraorbital rim; malar, paranasal, and nasal regions; mandible; and chin. In comparison to their autologous counterparts, alloplastic materials are more readily available, lack donor-site morbidity, decrease surgical time and cost, and still have relatively good postoperative tissue tolerance. However, these implants are not without their own spectrum of complications. Common solid implant materials include silicone, GoreTex (expanded polytetrafluorethylene; W. L. Gore & Associates Inc., Flagstaff, AZ), MedPor (high-density porous polyethylene; Porex Industries, Fairburn, GA), and Mersilene mesh (nonresorbable polyester fiber; Ethicon, Somerville, NJ). Each of these materials poses certain complication risks based on their surface contour (smooth vs. porous), pliability, and reactivity with surrounding tissue. In addition, certain implant locations within the head and neck are at risk for different postoperative complications. Although there are no evidence-based guidelines for implant reconstruction to help avoid common complications, there are several principles and techniques that are commonly employed by surgeons to help reduce complication rates. These include careful patient selection, proper choice of operative procedure, infection control practices (including pre/intraoperative systemic antibiotics, meticulous aseptic technique, impregnation/soaking of implant in antibiotic, irrigation of implant pocket with antibiotic, careful closure of tissue layers, and postoperative oral antibiotics), preoperative implant shaping, choice of surgical approach, and intraoperative surgical techniques. Larger, controlled trials are needed to confirm the efficacy of the aforementioned techniques in the reduction of postoperative complications.

An unusual complication of malar augmentation: transconjunctival exposure and scleral erosion.

The purpose of this report is to bring the attention of ophthalmologists to a lesser-known complication of bilateral transconjunctival exposure and scleral erosion caused by malar implant migration. A 26-year-old man presented with severe pain in left eye, worsening on attempted eye movement. His history included a road accident 1 year back, following which he had undergone bilateral malar implant placement. Examination revealed an implant that had migrated superiorly and breached the inferior forniceal conjunctiva, leading to scleral erosion. Exploration was carried out and the implant trimmed so as to clear it well off the orbital rim. Two weeks later, the patient presented with similar clinical features in his right eye. Debulking of the implant was then done on right side as well. The patient was relieved of his symptoms with free and painless extraocular movements after the procedure.

["Double barrel" free fibula flap and vascular risk. A national investigation in France]. / Lambeau libre de péroné en « double barre ¼ et risque vasculaire. Enquête nationale.

INTRODUCTION: The free fibula flap is the most commonly used flap for mandibular reconstruction thanks to its multiple advantages. Its main drawback is the thin width of the bone section. The "double barrel" fibula flap is a solution to this problem allowing reconstruction of both basilar and alveolar ridges for a stable prosthetic dental rehabilitation. The authors wanted to assess its use, in France, to evaluate its reliability, and to determine its indications. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The authors sent a questionnaire to the 25 French Maxillo-Facial University Hospital Departments. Questions concerned the surgical technique, its indications, and the operative results, between January 2002 and December 2007. RESULTS: Out of the 18 teams who answered, 16 used a free fibula flap for mandibular reconstruction but only seven used the double barrel technique, for a total of 24 double barrel reconstructions. Only one total necrosis was reported. The indications for double barrel fibula flap were nearly all for corpus reconstruction and the operating overtime was less than one hour. DISCUSSION: The international literature review analysis gives results which compare to French ones, with a weak rate of necrosis despite the intermediate rectangular ostectomy. This technique may be recommended especially since it does not increase the operative time much and it improves dental restoration.

An unusual complication of malar augmentation.

The purpose of this report is to describe an unusual complication of aesthetic alloplastic malar augmentation and to provide a brief review of the literature regarding this complication, its treatment, and its prevention. We review the case of a single patient who presented with a delayed malar pneumatocele after undergoing bilateral malar augmentation using rigid titanium screw fixation complicated by an anterior maxillary sinus wall defect. Although an effective and efficient method, rigid screw fixation is not without potential complications as evidenced by the currently reported implant-associated malar pneumatocele. Care should be taken to avoid damage to the maxillary sinus wall during fixation and, if encountered, the procedure should be aborted, the defect repaired, or a nonporous implant placed with postoperative counselling given to the patient.

A study of 25 zygomatic dental implants with 11 to 49 months' follow-up after loading.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate indications, surgical problems, complications, and treatment outcomes related to the placement of zygomatic implants. A second aim was to determine any prosthetic difficulties and complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five zygomatic implants were placed in 13 patients between April 1999 and December 2001. The patient age range was between 49 and 73 years, with a mean age of 59 years. All patients showed severe resorption of alveolar bone in the maxilla. All but 2 patients were smokers. Two patients had a history of cleft palate surgery, and 2 patients were known to be bruxers. Standard recommended surgical protocol was followed, and treatment was performed under general anesthesia. After abutment surgery, 9 patients received bar-retained overdentures, and 4 patients received fixed prostheses. RESULTS: No implants were lost, and few surgical complications were experienced. The follow-up period was 11 to 49 months. DISCUSSION: Although surgical problems precipitated by difficult anatomy in cleft patients and a patient with reduced interarch access were experienced, the results were favorable. Fabricating a functional and esthetic prosthesis can be a challenge. CONCLUSION: Zygomatic implants provide a treatment option for patients with severe maxillary resorption, defects, or situations where previous implant treatment has failed. In this experience, treatment with zygomatic implants was a predictable method with few complications, even in a group of patients that would not be considered ideal for implant treatment.

Maxillary and mandibular osteosyntheses with PLGA and P(L/DL)LA implants: a 5-year inpatient biocompatibility and degradation experience.

BACKGROUND: This study consists of a 5-year experience with 413 maxillary and mandibular resorbable plate osteosyntheses focusing on clinically apparent foreign body reaction (i.e., swelling, osteolyses, and fistulation), indirect implant degradation (i.e., palpability and radiographic reossification), and direct implant degradation (i.e., molecular weight and crystallinity of explants). METHODS: Eighty fracture and reconstruction cases (32 female and 48 male patients, aged 1 to 83 years) were osteofixated with poly(L-lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) copolymer (n = 20) (139 PLGA osteosyntheses) or poly(L-lactide-co-DL-lactide) [P(L/DL)LA] (n = 60) [274 P(L/DL)LA osteosyntheses]. Local revisions (n = 30) were performed during secondary operations at 3, 6, 12, 18, or 24 months. Average clinical and radiographic follow-up lasted 29 months (range, 6 to 63 months). RESULTS: Five patients (6 percent) had apparent foreign body reactions, whereas 75 (94 percent) did not. One P(L/DL)LA mild reaction was effectively treated with cold packs and analgesics, one PLGA and three P(L/DL)LA medium severe reactions were treated with curettage, and one local osteolysis disappeared at 6 months. Implant palpability lasted 12 (PLGA) or 24 months [P(L/DL)LA]. The difference was significant (p < 0.000001). Burr holes reossified at 24 (PLGA) and 36 months [P(L/DL)LA] (p < 0.05). The 85:15 PLGA explants' initial 44,600 molecular weight decreased to 11,000 at 6 months; and scarce powdering granular residuals, too small for molecular weight assessment, were encountered at 12 months. The 70:30 P(L/DL)LA initial molecular weight of 45,000 decreased to 25,000 at 6 months and 8,000 at 18 months and to similar granules at 24 months (p < 0.02). Histology showed macrophages, giant cells, lymphocyte infiltration, little granulocytic infiltration, and minimal bleeding residuals. CONCLUSIONS: Both copolymers showed reliable biocompatibility and disintegration. Overall, 6 percent clinically apparent foreign body reactions were controlled conservatively and by local curettage; 85:15 PLGA degraded within 12 months and 70:30 P(L/DL)LA within 24 months, leaving powdering residual granules. Burr holes reossified 12 months later.

Release of elements from retrieved maxillofacial plates and screws.

Vitallium appliances and surrounding tissues were investigated to evaluate the release and accumulation of elements. Four microplates, sixteen screws and surrounding tissues were removed from three patients presenting inflammation 4 to 6 years after surgery and were submitted to SEM and X-ray microprobe analysis. Histology was performed on paraffin or PMMA sections of tissues.A continuous release of elements from metallic appliances into soft tissues was observed. Cobalt, chromium, and nickel were detected in soft and boney tissues in close proximity to the appliance. Aluminium, as a component of screw coatings, accumulated in soft tissues, and a remarkable amount of aluminium was detected in the dense lamella of lamellar bone. The results suggest that coatings containing aluminium should be avoided and the time these appliances are allowed to remain in patients should be shortened. Further studies on element release and the fate of aluminium in bone are warranted.

Accumulation of aluminium in lamellar bone after implantation of titanium plates, Ti-6Al-4V screws, hydroxyapatite granules.

Titanium plates, Ti6Al4V screws and surrounding tissues, and biopsies of hydroxyapatite (Osprovit) grafts of maxillary sinus lifting were investigated to evaluate the release and accumulation of ions. Optical microscopy, SEM and X-ray microanalysis were carried out to evaluate the plates and screws removed from patients presenting inflammation and biopsies. Ions release from metallic appliances or leaching from granules towards soft tissues was observed. An accumulation of aluminium but not titanium was found in soft tissues. A peculiar accumulation of aluminium in the dense lamella of newly formed bone was recorded. The results seem to indicate that biological perturbations may be related to aluminium release from the tested biomaterials. The aluminium content of these biomaterials, its diffusion and accumulation are discussed. Further studies on ion release from biomaterials and aluminium fate in skeletal tissues are suggested.

Diagnostic and prognostic value of 99mTc-tetrofosmin scintigraphy in maxillofacial flaps.

In oro-maxillofacial malignancies, new therapeutic approaches are placing changing demands on the diverse diagnostic modalities. In contradistinction to mandibular reconstruction of former years, the transplants (microvascular anastomosed pedicled flaps, "flaps") now consist of one or more arteries feeding a soft tissue component attached to a piece of bone suitably fitted to fill the defect. We addressed the diagnostic value of technetium-99m tetrofosmin scintigraphy in differentiating between viability and non-viability of the soft tissue portion of flaps in the immediate postoperative assessment. A total of 60 patients who had received flaps for reconstruction of the mandible after partial resection were investigated with (99m)Tc-tetrofosmin 3-5 days after surgery. Scintigraphy consisted of (a) radionuclide angiography, (b) static planar imaging in four projections starting at 10 min post injection, and (c) single-photon emission tomography (SPET) performed immediately after the planar imaging. Normal perfusion associated with no defects throughout the soft tissue portion of the transplant was observed in 46/60 patients. This scintigraphic pattern was identical to viability and normal postoperative follow-up. Hypoperfusion and small defects on planar and SPET images indicated viability and uncomplicated postoperative healing in 6/60 patients, but non-viability/inadequate healing of the flap in 4/60 patients. Absence of perfusion combined with a large defect on static planar and SPET images definitively showed the non-viability of the flap (4/60 patients). It is concluded that (99m)Tc-tetrofosmin scintigraphy is a sensitive diagnostic tool for the immediate postoperative assessment of the viability and the adequacy of implantation of the soft tissue portion of flaps. Therefore tetrofosmin scintigraphy is an important modality in order (a) to define the optimal therapeutic regimen in the immediate postoperative period and (b) to provide better prognosis.

Outcome of extra-oral craniofacial endosseous implants.

We report our experience of endosseous implants designed to retain various types of facial prostheses that were inserted by the West of Scotland Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Service between January 1988 and September 1998. Forty-seven patients were given a total of 150 implants, most of which were auricular (n= 85) or orbital (n= 53). The functioning success rates were 100% and 75%, respectively. Soft tissue infection was the commonest complication, and could occur at any time after exposure of the implant, suggesting that life-long follow-up is required.

Dynamic study about metal release from titanium miniplates in maxillofacial surgery.

It has been shown that titanium (Ti) has had dramatic success in many surgical procedures as a result of its excellent mechanical properties and resistance to corrosion. There is still concern, however, about the release of metal and controversy surrounding whether or not the plates should be removed after bone healing. This study has been conducted to investigate whether or not there is a relationship between duration of plating and metal release from Ti miniplates in maxillofacial surgery. A prospective cohort study design was used. The concentration of Ti, in the soft tissues covering the plates, was examined in all patients who underwent removal of Ti miniplates from January 1998 to April 1999 (51 cases). Inductively Coupled Plasma-Optical Emission Spectrometry was used to measure Ti. Total ti and soluble Ti levels were compared to duration of plating (ranged from 15 days to 3 years, mean = 8 months). Correlation coefficients and two-way ANOVA were data processed. The average amount of total Ti in the soft tissues surrounding the plates was 1306 micrograms/g dry tissue. The mean of soluble Ti was 0.53 microgram/g dry tissue. The results of this study do not support the existence of a relationship between duration of plating and total Ti (correlation coefficient = 0.093 (P > 0.1) nor soluble Ti (correlation coefficient = 0.009 (P > 0.1) in the soft tissue surrounding the plates. Moreover, the only independent factor of Ti release found was associated with mechanical constraints during surgery. Almost 100% of Ti is released during the osteosynthesis. Then Ti levels remain constant in the surrounding tissues. Most of the time, Ti seems to be clinically inert. Compared to the possible risks of a second operation, removal of Ti miniplates should not be a routine procedure except in the case of complaints from patients, particularly in the case of infection, hypersensitivity, dehiscence or screw loosening.

Exposure of high-density porous polyethylene (Medpor) used for contour restoration and treatment.

Porous high-density polyethylene (Medpor) is a biocompatible large-pore, high-density polyethylene implant. It is well tolerated by surrounding tissue, and its porous structure is rapidly infiltrated by host tissue. It is a highly stable and somewhat flexible porous alloplast that has rapid tissue ingrowth into its pores. However, when the implant is placed under a thin cover of skin, there is a risk of exposure. A total of 52 Medpor implants were placed in 31 patients over a four-year period. The implants were used for the chin, malar area, nasal reconstruction, ear reconstruction, orbital reconstruction, and the correction of mandibular contour deformities. Many of these implants were placed in areas considered problematic, such as those with thin or atrophic soft-tissue coverage and extensive scarring. There were nine complications, including three patients in whom the implant was exposed; these are presented here.

Osseointegrated implants and orbital defects: U.C.L.A. experience.

PURPOSE: A clinical study of 23 craniofacial implants placed in 8 irradiated and nonirradiated orbital detects was conducted over a 7-year period. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Implant-retained orbital prostheses were fabricated, implant success rate was determined, and the soft tissue responses were recorded at 6-month intervals. As a result of patient death, no data were gathered on three implants. A five-point scale was used to record the health of the peri-implant soft tissues and the patients were followed from 9 to 72 months. The unit of measure was a visit/site that was assigned for each instance an implant site was evaluated. Evaluations were conducted at 6-month intervals, and for the study period, there were 80 visit/sites. RESULTS: The study revealed that 42.5% (34/80) of the visit/sites demonstrated an absence of inflammation; 23.7% (19/80) of visit/sites demonstrated slight redness; 13.8% (11/80) demonstrated peri-implant red and moist tissues; 6.2% (5/80) demonstrated granulation tissue associated with the implants; and 13.8% (11/80) infection of the peri-implant soft tissues was noted. Implant success rate was 35% (7/20); implant success rate in the nonradiated patients was 37.5% (3/8) and the success rate for radiated patients was 33.3% (4/12). Implants placed in the orbital region demonstrated a high failure rate. Most implant failures occurred late as opposed to early in the study period. CONCLUSION: Orbital implants should be placed in patients who understand that long-term success rates may be low and require meticulous hygiene maintenance.